死神来了

Is the rapid growth of China’s emerging industries driven by industrial subsidies?: People’s Daily_我的网站

恶作剧之吻

一 | 最近几天，据网友反馈，老版本的bilbili动画和概念版的app只能选择清晰流畅的质量。旧版本指2018年1月30日之前所有的bilbili应用程序的Android版本。

Workers assemble solar photovoltaic modules at a smart manufacturing workshop of Ronma Solar Energy Group in Jindong district of Jinhua city, East China's Zhejiang Province, on July 28, 2026. Photo: VCG
China saw robust exports in electric vehicles (EV), lithium batteries and photovoltaic products, known as the "new three," in the first half of this year. More notably, robotics, artificial intelligence (AI) and innovative drugs, which represent the future direction of industrial development, are also emerging as new calling cards for China's foreign trade.
However, the impressive performance provoked unease among some Western media outlets and politicians. Some have deliberately portrayed China's rapid industrial development and strong competitiveness as a result of government subsidies, pushing the false claim that subsidies have created overcapacity and those low-priced Chinese products are flooding global markets. Such fallacies, which simply equate industrial subsidies with overcapacity, are not only logically flawed but also factually groundless.
In practice, many countries adopt industrial policies tailored to their national conditions and development needs, such as providing research and development (R&D) subsidies for emerging industries and risk related subsidies for agriculture.
Well-designed industrial subsidies can help address market failures, promote technological innovation and environmental protection, reduce poverty and support balanced development, rather than cause so called "overcapacity."
Multiple reports by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development have noted that the number of industrial policies worldwide has grown rapidly over the past five years, with R&D subsidies, tax incentives and low interest loans for emerging industries becoming common international practices.
Forcibly linking industrial subsidies to "overcapacity" is, in essence, a political manipulation based on double standards. The US, for example, plans to provide $750 billion in various subsidies from 2022 to 2031 under its Inflation Reduction Act. Subsidized EVs are subject to requirements such as production and sales in the US or North America, effectively excluding other WTO members. US industrial subsidies for AI are even greater than those of all other countries combined.
Similarly, according to incomplete statistics, the European Commission is expected to provide more than 1.44 trillion euros ($210 billion) in various subsidies between 2021 and 2030. The EU's Industrial Accelerator Act links local content directly to financial support through "Made in EU" requirements, creating serious investment barriers and institutional discrimination.
Have these massive subsidies been labeled as causing "overcapacity"? The answer is no. While claiming that China's industrial subsidies lead to so-called overcapacity, these countries are themselves providing massive subsidies to their own industries. Such double standards amount to selective accusations targeting China, aimed at politicizing trade and economic issues and weaponizing industrial policy.
At a deeper level, accusations that "China's industrial subsidies cause overcapacity" are merely a pretext, reflecting growing anxiety and fear over the rising competitiveness of Chinese industries.
Looking back at the repeated hype in Western media, the criticism has consistently targeted China's most globally competitive industries, including new-energy vehicles, photovoltaics and power batteries. This exposes the real intention of shifting the blame for their own lagging industrial development onto China while stepping up restrictions against Chinese industries.
China's breakthroughs in these industries have been driven by advances in homegrown technologies, complete industrial and supply chains, and robust market competition, rather than by policy subsidies as some have claimed.
In recent years, China has taken multiple steps to regulate and improve its subsidy policies, from reviewing and correcting inappropriate local subsidies to exploring a unified negative list mechanism for local fiscal subsidies. China applies subsidies equally to all market entities, including foreign invested enterprises, strictly follows WTO rules, and continues to improve the compliance, effectiveness and transparency of its subsidy policies.
Rather than fabricating and hyping baseless claims about subsidies and obsessing over building trade barriers, certain Western media outlets and politicians should focus on addressing their own weaknesses and increasing investment in research and development. They should embrace healthy market competition with an inclusive mindset, promote mutual benefit through greater openness, and win markets and drive progress through genuine innovation.
This was compiled and translated by the Global Times English edition based on an article published in the "Chisu Jinsheng" economic commentary column of the People's Daily on August 10, 2026.
。无论着陆与否，他们只能选择480p透明和360p光滑质量。根据小变的专业测试，在从谷歌商店下载的旧版本中，版本号是1.12.0，更新时间是2018年1月2日，官方版本的bilibili已经被阉割了720p高清晰度和更高清晰度的图片质量，从那时起该版本仍然可以观看高质量的视频。在国内安卓市场上的历史版本中，v5.21.2版本的质量也被阉割为剩余的480p清晰和360p流畅的质量，而以后的版本仍然可以看到高质量的视频。bilibilli概念版阉割采用一刀切的方法。无论是最新的概念版还是其他旧版本，都不能打开高质量的图片。他们只能看480p清晰和360p流畅的视频，所以概念版可以说是名存实亡。bilbili，又称bilbili、bilbili或B站，是一个与ACG相关的弹幕视频共享网站。它的前身是视频分享网站Mikufans。该网站由网民徐毅于2009年6月26日创建。Mikufans的初衷是为用户提供一个稳定的弹幕视频共享网站。

二 | 网站于2010年1月24日更名为bilibili。大理视频区主要分为比利比利直播区、动画区、戏剧区、音乐区、舞蹈区、游戏区、科技区、广告区、娱乐区、鬼兽区、影视区、放映厅、时尚区。此外，主页上还有直播、图表、演播室、游戏中心（尤其是大理代理登陆界面的游戏发布平台）、周边、RSS订阅链接等，除了视频外，B站还运行了很多游戏，如命运/标题分配、失事校园2等。除去旧版本和概念版本的高质量，要求用户伪装下载最新版本。